<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boondock Saints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/boondock-saints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/boondock-saints/</link>
	<description>We watch them, so you don't have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shoot &#8216;Em Up</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/boondock-saints/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoot &#8216;Em Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/?p=133#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] Forthcoming Releases                   &#171; Boondock Saints [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Forthcoming Releases                   &laquo; Boondock Saints [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/boondock-saints/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/?p=133#comment-63</guid>
		<description>First up.  I liked Boondock Saints.  I own the DVD.  It got 4 out of 5 on the rewatchability index, a rating reserved for movies that can be rewatched repeatedly.  Now, onto the rebuttal.

&quot;I would also like to add that while your ability to review cinema is limited it is somehow superseded by your glaring inability to write.&quot;  I&#039;m sticking this up on my testimonial wall.  My first *hate* mail.  Normally I only get *indifference&quot; mail.

I&#039;m sorry but paint by numbers simple.  Do you imply by this that Boondock Saints has a detailed intricate plot.  Let&#039;s see if I can summarise the storyline.  Two Irish Boys get accosted in their neighbourhood bar by Russian mobsters, beat them up.   Mobsters retaliate and get killed for their efforts.  Irish boys go on revenge killing spree.  Bloodshed continues, Decide to &quot;kill Everyone&quot; get caught, escape.  Kill the mafia boss.

Now I&#039;m sure I can summarise this even further.  Revenge by Russian Mobsters causes Irish twins to &quot;kill everyone&quot; allowing the director many excuses for Gun Porn.

Now I concede that my writing is poor (you&#039;d be in agreement with every English teacher I&#039;ve ever had).  here&#039;s an example.  &quot;spent cartridges ejaculating everywhere&quot; would read far better had I written &quot;guns ejaculating spent cartridges everywhere&quot;  It would have been far more in keeping with the pornography metaphor I had going there.  (I suspect things like pornography metaphors are why my teachers never liked my writing)

I am reminded of the Disclaimer from Ixnay on the Hombre.  &quot;If it offends you, just don&#039;t listen.&quot;  Although, this is a stupid attitude for me to have.  I would rather say &quot;If it offends you, please tell all your friends so they can come and read and get offended too and perhaps I can spread the word like that&quot;

Thanks for the comment, and please, leave the names of other of your favourite movies so I can inflict my poor reviews and poorer writing on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First up.  I liked Boondock Saints.  I own the DVD.  It got 4 out of 5 on the rewatchability index, a rating reserved for movies that can be rewatched repeatedly.  Now, onto the rebuttal.</p>
<p>&#8220;I would also like to add that while your ability to review cinema is limited it is somehow superseded by your glaring inability to write.&#8221;  I&#8217;m sticking this up on my testimonial wall.  My first *hate* mail.  Normally I only get *indifference&#8221; mail.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but paint by numbers simple.  Do you imply by this that Boondock Saints has a detailed intricate plot.  Let&#8217;s see if I can summarise the storyline.  Two Irish Boys get accosted in their neighbourhood bar by Russian mobsters, beat them up.   Mobsters retaliate and get killed for their efforts.  Irish boys go on revenge killing spree.  Bloodshed continues, Decide to &#8220;kill Everyone&#8221; get caught, escape.  Kill the mafia boss.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m sure I can summarise this even further.  Revenge by Russian Mobsters causes Irish twins to &#8220;kill everyone&#8221; allowing the director many excuses for Gun Porn.</p>
<p>Now I concede that my writing is poor (you&#8217;d be in agreement with every English teacher I&#8217;ve ever had).  here&#8217;s an example.  &#8220;spent cartridges ejaculating everywhere&#8221; would read far better had I written &#8220;guns ejaculating spent cartridges everywhere&#8221;  It would have been far more in keeping with the pornography metaphor I had going there.  (I suspect things like pornography metaphors are why my teachers never liked my writing)</p>
<p>I am reminded of the Disclaimer from Ixnay on the Hombre.  &#8220;If it offends you, just don&#8217;t listen.&#8221;  Although, this is a stupid attitude for me to have.  I would rather say &#8220;If it offends you, please tell all your friends so they can come and read and get offended too and perhaps I can spread the word like that&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, and please, leave the names of other of your favourite movies so I can inflict my poor reviews and poorer writing on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/boondock-saints/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgymoviesreviewed.com/?p=133#comment-60</guid>
		<description>You sir have written a dodgy review.  You have given one of the greatest underground cult flix of all time a bad name.  Allow me to add that it is blatantly obvious that all your taste is in your mouth. I would also like to add that while your ability to review cinema is limited it is somehow superseded by your glaring inability to write.

Yes your brain must be tiny as it obviously can not handle a film that isn&#039;t paint by numbers simple. Perhaps you should take up reviewing childrens movies in hopes that the plot will be simple enough for you to understand.  

Whatever the failing of your brain please be kind to the planet and no longer inflict your poor reviews and poorer writing on humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sir have written a dodgy review.  You have given one of the greatest underground cult flix of all time a bad name.  Allow me to add that it is blatantly obvious that all your taste is in your mouth. I would also like to add that while your ability to review cinema is limited it is somehow superseded by your glaring inability to write.</p>
<p>Yes your brain must be tiny as it obviously can not handle a film that isn&#8217;t paint by numbers simple. Perhaps you should take up reviewing childrens movies in hopes that the plot will be simple enough for you to understand.  </p>
<p>Whatever the failing of your brain please be kind to the planet and no longer inflict your poor reviews and poorer writing on humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

